Tag Archive | "CONSUMER Disputes"
Builder to pay complainants
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, has directed M/s Castle Concrete Infrastructure Pvt Ltd to pay a compensation of Rs 1 lakh to each of the three complainants for suffering mental agony as the company did not construct flats in time and also did not refund the deposited amount. The company has also been directed [...]
Continue reading...Mumbai Builder gets jail for not executing conveyance deed
Sunday, June 27, 2010
In a landmark judgment, a district consumer Disputes redressal forum has sentenced a developer to two years’ jail for not executing the conveyance deed in favour of a Malad society despite directives by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. On June 23, the South Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum—comprising president S B Dhumal and [...]
Continue reading...Firm to pay for not issuing sale deed
Friday, January 8, 2010
The written statement of the company is a bundle of lies to justify their inaction in issuing a sale deed to the complainant CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has held Shalimar Estates Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh, guilty for not issuing the sale deed of a residential plot to the complainant despite payment of all [...]
Continue reading...Builder goes to national forum State Panel Had Fined Developer For ‘Cheating’ On Space
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Mumbai: A developer, who was penalised by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission after it held that the built-up area could not include common spaces like the lift lobby, landing and the staircase, has appealed to the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to quash the order. The state commission, on May 22, ordered Trison Builders [...]
Continue reading...Builder’s liability for deficiency in service
Saturday, June 13, 2009
The realty buyer is protected under different laws against a defaulting builder or developer. In the current scenario, even though the buyer and the builder-developer are bound by the terms of the seller-buyer agreement, developers have not been able to meet development schedules and are battling consumers on the issue of timely delivery.For the buyers too, [...]
Continue reading...Builder ordered to pay flat-owner for less space
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Mumbai: In a significant judgment that could be a trend-setting step towards protecting consumers against exploitation by builders, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed a city builder to pay a flat purchaser Rs 10.25 lakh with interest. The builder had passed off the super builtup area as the built-up area and given the [...]
Continue reading...HUDA fined for delay in plot possession
Monday, June 1, 2009
HOLDING THE Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) guilty for failing to offer the possession of a plot in Gurgaon even 11 years after the allotment, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula, has directed it to refund the amount charged with interest. It has also asked it not to charge any extension fee for two years [...]
Continue reading...Silver City to cough up Rs 50,000
Friday, May 29, 2009
Told to pay 24 pc interest on Rs 18.63 lakh, Rs 10,000 as litigation cost HOLDING SILVER City Housing and Infrastructure Limited deficient in services, the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has penalize the developers for their false claim that construction has been started at a spot. The consumer forum has directed Silver City to pay Rs 50,000 [...]
Continue reading...UT, Estate Office ‘befooling’ people
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Both held guilty of unfair trade practice of concealing facts about area under auction, to refund Rs 2 lakh along with interest to complainant TAKING THE UT Administration and Estate Office to task for “befooling” the people who participated in the auction of residential and commercial sites, the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has directed these authorities [...]
Continue reading...Builder directed to pay Rs-25,000 compensation
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
THE CONSUMER Disputes Redress Forum has held A and A Builders and Developers guilty of unfair trade practices and deficient in services. It has directed them to pay Rs 25,000 as compensation to a Kaithal resident for delay in allotment of flat, leading to escalation of the price. Taking into consideration the plaint filed by Sanjeev [...]
Continue reading...ICICI Bank held guilty of unfair trade practice
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Asked to refund Rs 2.71 lakh at 12 per cent interest THE CONSUMER Disputes Redressal Forum held ICICI bank guilty of unfair trade practices and directed them to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation to Panchkula resident S.K. Garg. The bank was also asked to refund Rs 2.71 lakh at 12 per cent interest to the complainant. Garg moved [...]
Continue reading...
- OCUS Group Announces the Launch of its Second Commercial Project in Gurgaon
- Builders have no right to sell stilt parking: Supreme Court
- FAR raised, Noida set to grow taller, greener
- Now you can make 3-storey house in Noida
- HDFC raises home loan rates by 50 bps
- MP builder cites staff crunch for project delay
- GURGAON TO CP BY METRO RAIL FROM SEPTEMBER 3
- Consumer Affairs Ministry Gives Green Signal to 49% FDI in Multi-Brand Retail
- Maharashtra Govt Prohibits Use of Petrol Pump Land for Real Estate Purpose in Mumbai
- 6 Chennai Projects Get Top Ratings from CRISIL
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
0 Comments